ֳ

Rating Action Commentary

ֳ Affirms Angola at 'B'; Outlook Negative

Fri 01 Sep, 2017 - 4:05 PM ET

ֳ-London-01 September 2017: ֳ has affirmed Angola's Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B' with a Negative Outlook.

A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary.

KEY RATING DRIVERS
Angola's 'B' IDRs reflect the following key rating drivers:

The challenging adjustment of the heavily commodity dependent Angolan economy is continuing as oil prices have stabilised in the USD45-55/b range over the past 12 months. The authorities have resisted pressures for the currency to weaken further since April 2016 after previous devaluations and the tight fiscal stance has prevailed, but foreign currency is in short supply, inflation is high and growth prospects subdued.

The general election on 23 August 2017 was a notable political event for Angola. President dos Santos, who had ruled the country since 1979, was not running and a new president, Joao Lourenco, the defence minister and, like dos Santos, a member of the ruling People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), will soon take over. The MPLA won the elections confidently with 61% of the votes, although this is down from 72% in 2012. ֳ expects the new government to maintain policy continuity in the near term, not least because dos Santos will remain president of the MPLA.

ֳ estimates the economy contracted by 1% in 2016 and believes it will grow by just 1% in 2017, as a result of FX shortages and fiscal tightening. The medium-term growth potential is weak relative to rating peers. The 2% recovery forecast for 2018 and 2019 compares with the average 3.8% GDP growth over 2011-2016, which was in line with the 'B' median of 4% GDP growth.

ֳ expects the Angolan economy to remain dependent on commodity exports over the longer term as the government's economic policy strategy of diversification is constrained by the weak business environment, low human and physical capital and recent erosion of price competitiveness.

High inflation is a key rating weakness. The surge in inflation to a peak of 42% in December 2016 was one of the main adverse consequences of the oil price shock. ֳ forecasts 29% annual average inflation in 2017 and 21% in 2018. This compares with the 'B' rating median of 5% and the sub-Saharan Africa average of 10.4%.

The central bank has maintained the USD peg at around AOA163 since April 2016. It has implemented extensive administrative measures that have constrained access to foreign exchange and substantially tightened domestic liquidity conditions. As a result of these controls, the parallel exchange rate is about 100% weaker than the official rate in late August, although the differential has narrowed in recent months. In a statement in May the minister of finance noted that the exchange rate would have to be devalued "sooner or later".

The government responded to the oil price shock by a cumulative fiscal tightening of 18pp of GDP in 2015 and 2016, measured by the non-oil primary balance - an exceptionally large adjustment. There has been a further squeeze on real wages in the public sector this year, despite the run-up to the elections in August. At the same time, the risk of public sector arrears building up has increased and could also lead to banking sector strains.

ֳ believes that the fiscal deficit will rise to 5.5% in 2017, from 3.9% in 2016 on the back of election related spending, but the deficit will fall to around 4.5% in 2018 and 2019 supported by higher oil prices. However, due to the political transition there is larger than usual uncertainty around the fiscal strategy.

ֳ estimates that the general government debt has peaked at 54% of GDP at end-2016 compared with 23.5% in 2013 and in line with the 'B' median of 56%. Our baseline debt dynamics show a gradual decline in the debt to GDP ratio in the next years, driven primarily by the combination of high domestic inflation (denominator effect) and modest FX depreciation. However, a lack of transparency in regards to SOE financing, contingent liabilities and potential FX devaluation pose a risk of a further rise in the debt burden. The debt of the state oil company Sonangol, which has taken on significant para-fiscal activities, was 17% of GDP at end-2016. At the same time, government deposits at 12% of GDP and USD5 billion of the sovereign wealth fund lower the net sovereign debt.

The current account deficit narrowed substantially to 4% of GDP in 2016 from 9.5% in 2015, as a result of a sharp import compression due to the FX shortage and a moderation in the services and income deficits. The current account deficit should widen to close to 5% of GDP in 2017 as imports start to pick up and outweigh a rise in revenues from oil exports. ֳ expects international reserve coverage to fall below 6 months of CXP in 2018, although this is still above the 'B' median of 3.9 months.

Amid a weak macro-environment, the health of the banking system has deteriorated. This is most evident in rising levels of NPLs, which reached close to 17.6% in 2016 according to the central bank. Corporates struggled to pay their loans and the rise in NPLs could also be a sign of increasing government arrears. The system's official capital position was 18.7% in September 2016, but a number of individual banks are struggling. This includes state-owned BPC, which is being recapitalised with state funds of around 1.5% of GDP. The loss of Corresponding Banking Relations (CBRs) in USD is an additional challenge that has the potential to limit economic recovery.

ֳ's proprietary SRM assigns Angola a score equivalent to a rating of 'B-' on the Long-Term FC IDR scale.

ֳ's sovereign rating committee adjusted the output from the SRM to arrive at the final LT FC IDR by applying its QO, relative to rated peers, as follows:
- External: +1 notch, to reflect strong foreign reserve levels (21% of GDP at May 2017) and the fact Angola is a net external creditor.

ֳ's SRM is the agency's proprietary multiple regression rating model that employs 18 variables based on three year centred averages, including one year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a LT FC IDR. ֳ's QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable and/or not fully reflected in the SRM.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
The main factors that could lead to a downgrade are:
-Depletion of fiscal and external reserves.
-Sharp increase in public sector debt/GDP, for example, owing to materialisation of contingent liabilities.
- Failure to attract significant financing sources, precipitating a more abrupt macroeconomic adjustment.

The Outlook is Negative. Consequently, ֳ does not currently anticipate developments with a material likelihood of leading to an upgrade. However, the following factors could lead to positive rating action:
- Easing financing constraints for the economy, for example due to a recovery in oil prices.
- Narrowing of the budget deficit consistent with the stabilisation of public sector debt/GDP.
- Policy adjustments, resulting in reduced external and macroeconomic vulnerabilities.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS
- ֳ forecasts Brent oil to average, USD52.5/bl in 2017, 55/bl in 2018 and USD60/bl in 2019.
- ֳ assumes that Angola will continue to have access to multilateral and bilateral funding, including from China, as well as from commercial creditors.

The full list of rating actions is as follows:

Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'; Outlook Negative
Long-Term Local-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'; Outlook Negative
Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'
Short-Term Local-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'
Country Ceiling affirmed at 'B'
Issue ratings on long-term senior-unsecured foreign-currency bonds affirmed at 'B'
Issue ratings on long-term senior-unsecured local-currency bonds affirmed at 'B'

Contact:
Primary Analyst
Gergely Kiss
Director
+44 20 3530 1425
ֳ Limited
30 North Colonnade
London E14 5GN

Secondary Analyst
Jermaine Leonard
Director
+852 2263 9830

Committee Chairperson
Ed Parker
Managing Director
+44 20 3530 1176

Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@fitchratings.com.

Additional information is available on

Applicable Criteria
Sovereign Rating Criteria (pub. 21 Jul 2017)

Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Solicitation Status
Endorsement Policy


ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: /UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT . PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT /SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright © 2017 by ֳ, Inc., ֳ Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), ֳ relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources ֳ believes to be credible. ֳ conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of ֳ’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of ֳ’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information ֳ relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to ֳ and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, ֳ must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and ֳ does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A ֳ rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by ֳ are based on established criteria and methodologies that ֳ is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of ֳ and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. ֳ is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All ֳ reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a ֳ report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a ֳ rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of ֳ. ֳ does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. ֳ receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, ֳ will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by ֳ shall not constitute a consent by ֳ to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, ֳ research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: ֳ Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by ֳ is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

PARTICIPATION STATUS

The rated entity (and/or its agents) or, in the case of structured finance, one or more of the transaction parties participated in the rating process except that the following issuer(s), if any, did not participate in the rating process, or provide additional information, beyond the issuer’s available public disclosure.

Solicitation Status

The ratings above were solicited and assigned or maintained at the request of the rated entity/issuer or a related third party. Any exceptions follow below.

ENDORSEMENT POLICY

ֳ's approach to ratings endorsement so that ratings produced outside the EU may be used by regulated entities within the EU for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU Regulation with respect to credit rating agencies, can be found on the EU Regulatory Disclosures page. The endorsement status of all International ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for all structured finance transactions on the ֳ website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.