ֳ

Rating Action Commentary

ֳ Affirms Angola at 'B'; Outlook Stable

Thu 20 Dec, 2018 - 8:04 AM ET

ֳ-Hong Kong-20 December 2018: ֳ has affirmed Angola's Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B' with a Stable Outlook.

A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary.

KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'B' rating reflects Angola's diminished level of fiscal and external reserves, high public debt burden, and frequent downward revisions to GDP, all of which is balanced against its substantial FX revenue from hydrocarbon production, the government's demonstrated ability to make significant fiscal adjustments, and Angola's recently-negotiated IMF programme.

The combination of stagnating oil production and lower oil prices have brought Angola's external and fiscal buffers to their lowest point in seven years. Angola's gross international reserves declined to USD16.2 billion as of end-October 2018, down from USD27 billion as of end-October 2014. Reserves continued to fall in 2018, despite a current account (CA) surplus, as the National Bank of Angola (BNA) deployed reserves to manage an orderly depreciation of the kwanza over the year and to increase foreign-currency liquidity within the economy. In January 2018, the BNA moved from a de facto peg to a weekly FX auction system that allowed for the FX rate versus the US dollar to move by as much as 2% from the previous week's auction. Subsequently the kwanza depreciated by 46% over 2018.

In December, the IMF approved a USD3.7 billion three-year Extended Fund Facility (EFF). Under the programme, USD990 million will disburse before the end of the year, which will bolster Angola's reserves and support the ongoing adjustments to the FX market. The EFF should also make it easier for Angola to access other sources of external financing, allowing the government to meet its expected external financing needs of approximately 6% of GDP in 2019 and to begin rebuilding reserves. ֳ expects that combined with continued depreciation of the kwanza and tighter fiscal policy reserves growth will turn positive in 2019.

The IMF programme's main focus is fiscal consolidation and Angola has already demonstrated its ability to lower the fiscal deficit. The government reports that the 2018 fiscal balance is on track for a surplus of 0.6% of GDP, widening to 1.5% of GDP in 2019. ֳ believes that unaccounted for spending and/or arrears clearance may take the 2018 balance into a small deficit, but notes that the final outturn will still mark a substantial narrowing compared with the fiscal deficit of 6.3% of GDP in 2017. The narrowing deficit is partly the result of higher oil revenues from higher prices and from the FX adjustment, but also reflects deep expenditure cuts, both to the current and capital budgets.

ֳ expects additional fiscal consolidation in 2019 and 2020, as the government implements a planned VAT in June 2019. Additional consolidation will help to reduce Angola's large stock of government and government-guaranteed debt. ֳ forecasts Angola's total public sector debt burden to reach 81% of GDP as of end-2018, up from 65% at end-2017. Of that amount, 77% of GDP is general government debt, with the rest composed of state-owned enterprise debt, most of it from Sonangol, the state-owned oil company.

Angola's economy has performed below expectations in 2018, as oil production has fallen and the government slashed spending. ֳ forecasts GDP to contract marginally by 0.1%, with growth improving to 2.5% in 2019, as total oil and gas production experiences a small increase from 2018. ֳ's baseline scenario envisages non-oil growth increasing as the effects of greater foreign-currency liquidity are felt and the government's reform programme is implemented. We expect that overall GDP growth will average approximately 3% over the medium term. However, ֳ believes that Angola's economy will continue to be driven by hydrocarbon production and government spending for the foreseeable future, which leaves the country vulnerable to the risks of negative oil price shocks and/or long-run decreases in production levels.

ֳ forecasts a current account surplus of 1.8% of GDP in 2018, compared with a deficit of 10% of GDP in 2015. ֳ forecasts the current account to remain in surplus, but expects it to narrow as oil export receipts fall on lower prices and imports increase with higher economic growth. The fall in official reserves and private sector foreign assets has taken Angola from a net external creditor to a net external debt position of 7% of GDP.

Economic headwinds have contributed to deteriorated asset quality at Angola's banks, and weak balance sheets raise the prospect of contingent liabilities materialising for the sovereign. NPLs reached 28.8% at end-2017, but an ongoing clean-up of public banks should bring the ratio down. Nominal credit growth turned positive in 2018, but at approximately 30%, it is inflated by kwanza depreciation. A quarter of loans are foreign currency-denominated. Loan growth is likely to continue in 2019 as lending activity is correlated with the oil sector. The end of directed currency sales and the expected greater foreign currency liquidity will also support growth in lending.

Angola's ratings are constrained by structural weaknesses, most notably poor performance on governance and human development indicators and the highest level of commodity dependence among ֳ-rated sovereigns. GDP per capita is above the 'B' median, but this reflects the size of the oil sector and not of broad-based economic growth potential.

SOVEREIGN RATING MODEL (SRM) and QUALITATIVE OVERLAY (QO)
ֳ's proprietary SRM assigns Angola a score equivalent to a rating of 'CCC+' on the Long-Term Foreign-Currency (LT FC) IDR scale.

ֳ's sovereign rating committee adjusted the output from the SRM to arrive at the final LT FC IDR by applying its QO, relative to rated peers, as follows:
- Macro: +1 notch, to reflect improvement in the economic policy framework, including FX regime adjustments and fiscal tightening.
- External Finances: +1 notch, to reflect the expected external support from the IMF EFF and the additional sources of external financing available to Angola.

ֳ's SRM is the agency's proprietary multiple regression rating model that employs 18 variables based on three-year centred averages, including one year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a LT FC IDR. ֳ's QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable and/or not fully reflected in the SRM.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
The Stable Outlook reflects ֳ's assessment that upside and downside risks to the ratings are currently well balanced. Consequently, ֳ's sensitivity analysis does not currently anticipate developments with a high likelihood of leading to a rating change.

The main factors that, individually or collectively, could lead to negative rating action are:
- Further deterioration of fiscal buffers and/or external international reserves.
- Failure to stabilise public sector debt/GDP.
- Failure to implement a reform agenda that supports non-oil GDP growth and maintains access to external financing flows.

The main factors that could lead to positive rating action are:
- A steady rise in oil revenue supporting an improved sovereign balance sheet and the rebuilding of external reserves.
- Sustained implementation of economic reforms that support growth in the non-oil sectors of the economy.
- An improvement in the business environment as well as income per capita, and rising governance standards.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS
- ֳ forecasts Brent oil to average USD65/bl in 2019 and USD62.5/bl in 2020.

The full list of rating actions is as follows:

Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'; Outlook Stable
Long-Term Local-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'; Outlook Stable
Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'
Short-Term Local-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'
Country Ceiling affirmed at 'B'
Issue ratings on long-term senior-unsecured foreign-currency bonds affirmed at 'B'

Contact:
Primary Analyst
Jermaine Leonard
Director
+852 2263 9830
ֳ (Hong Kong) Limited
68 Des Voeux Road Central
Hong Kong

Secondary Analyst
Jan Friederich
Senior Director
+852 2263 9910

Committee Chairperson
James McCormack
Managing Director
+852 2263 9625

Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@thefitchgroup.com
Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: wailun.wan@thefitchgroup.com

Additional information is available on
Applicable Criteria
Country Ceilings Criteria - Effective from 19 July 2018 to 5 July 2019 (pub. 19 Jul 2018)
Sovereign Rating Criteria - Effective from 19 July 2018 to 27 May 2019 (pub. 19 Jul 2018)

Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Solicitation Status
Endorsement Policy

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: /UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT . PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT /SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2019 by ֳ, Inc., ֳ Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), ֳ relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources ֳ believes to be credible. ֳ conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of ֳ's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of ֳ's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information ֳ relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to ֳ and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, ֳ must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and ֳ does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A ֳ rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by ֳ are based on established criteria and methodologies that ֳ is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of ֳ and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. ֳ is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All ֳ reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a ֳ report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a ֳ rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of ֳ. ֳ does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. ֳ receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, ֳ will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by ֳ shall not constitute a consent by ֳ to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, ֳ research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: ֳ Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by ֳ is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
ֳ, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see /site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

PARTICIPATION STATUS

The rated entity (and/or its agents) or, in the case of structured finance, one or more of the transaction parties participated in the rating process except that the following issuer(s), if any, did not participate in the rating process, or provide additional information, beyond the issuer’s available public disclosure.

Solicitation Status

The ratings above were solicited and assigned or maintained at the request of the rated entity/issuer or a related third party. Any exceptions follow below.

ENDORSEMENT POLICY

ֳ's approach to ratings endorsement so that ratings produced outside the EU may be used by regulated entities within the EU for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU Regulation with respect to credit rating agencies, can be found on the EU Regulatory Disclosures page. The endorsement status of all International ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for all structured finance transactions on the ֳ website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.