ֳ

ֳ Wire

Uncertainty Remains Heightened in Bangladesh amid Political Transition

Thu 15 Aug, 2024 - 3:11 AM ET

ֳ-Hong Kong-15 August 2024: The fall of Bangladesh’s Awami League government, after protests in July and August, raises uncertainty about the sovereign’s credit profile, says ֳ. Downward pressure on Bangladesh’s rating could increase if the political transition faces challenges, including prolonged political violence, or leads to policy paralysis and exacerbates fiscal or external stresses.

ֳ downgraded Bangladesh’s rating to ‘B+’/Stable, from ‘BB-’/Negative, in May 2024. This reflected sustained weakening of the country’s external buffers, leaving the country more vulnerable to external shocks. We believed that this weakening would be challenging to reverse, despite reforms under an IMF-backed programme, including a shift towards greater exchange-rate flexibility.

We believe the protests are likely to affect economic metrics in the current quarter, hurting growth and tax revenue collection, as well as pushing up consumer price inflation, which reached 11.7% yoy in July 2024. There is also likely to be an impact on readymade garment (RMG) exports and remittance inflows, Bangladesh’s two key sources of foreign earnings. At this stage, we assume these effects to be temporary, and that political stability is restored and sustained.



The appointment of an interim government on 8 August appears to have eased the immediate political instability, but Bangladesh’s society remains highly polarised and the longer-term political direction uncertain. A roughly 11% recovery in the Dhaka Stock Exchange’s DSEX Index between end-July and 13 August signals moderate investor confidence in the interim administration, suggesting large-scale capital flight is a low risk for now.

However, confidence could weaken if the ongoing transition does not go smoothly and adverse economic effects could mount. The timing of prospective elections remains unclear. Deciding this, and subsequently holding elections, could raise political risk. Furthermore, political gridlock remains a possibility following such elections, as the diverse range of political actors - the somewhat weakened Awami League, the Bangladesh National Party, the other main party, the student movement that led the recent protests, the military and Islamist groups – compete for power.

Another risk is that foreign firms could scale back RMG orders or source from other markets, which could add to external pressures. We stated in May that increased external vulnerability, for example, due to a marked decline in foreign-exchange reserves or other liquidity buffers, could lead to negative rating action.

Reserves at end-June, before the protests, stood at USD21.8 billion - an estimated four months of import cover. This is higher than the USD18.4 billion in May when we completed our rating assessment. Moreover, near-term debt repayment pressures should be moderate. The public sector’s external debt service due in 2025 is about USD4.3 billion, of which USD1.5 billion is bilateral debt and USD2.2 billion is owed to multilaterals. We expect financing from these official creditors to continue under our baseline, supporting external debt servicing capacity. Nonetheless, future reserves data will be a key metric to analyse the impact of the ongoing political transition on external liquidity strains.

If the interim or next government were to backtrack on the previous government’s recent commitment to greater exchange-rate flexibility in a bid to shore up near-term macroeconomic stability, intervention to support the taka could add to pressure on reserves. However, we believe this risk to be contained.

We also assume that the interim government, as well as its successor, will adhere to the broad policy commitments under Bangladesh’s IMF programme, but significant political instability or gridlock could complicate programme adherence. Significant slippage on key programme targets like fiscal metrics and exchange-rate liberalisation could jeopardise Bangladesh’s access to IMF and other multilateral funding support, further weakening its external position and increasing the risk of negative sovereign rating action.

Contacts:

Sagarika Chandra
Director, Sovereigns
+852 2263 9921
sagarika.chandra@fitchratings.com
ֳ (Hong Kong) Limited
19/F Man Yee Building
68 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong

Thomas Rookmaaker
Head of Asia Pacific Sovereigns
+852 2263 9891
thomas.rookmaaker@fitchratings.com

Duncan Innes-Ker
Senior Director, ֳ Wire
+852 2263 9993
duncan.innes-ker@thefitchgroup.com





Media Relations: Peter Hoflich, Singapore, Tel: +65 6796 7229, Email: peter.hoflich@thefitchgroup.com
Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 6796 7234, Email: leslie.tan@thefitchgroup.com

The above article originally appeared as a post on the ֳ Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at . All opinions expressed are those of ֳ.


All ֳ (ֳ) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: /understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following /rating-definitions-document details ֳ's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. ֳ's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders’ relevant interests are available at /site/regulatory. ֳ may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA- or FCA-registered ֳ company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the ֳ website.

In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), ֳ relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources ֳ believes to be credible. ֳ conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of ֳ's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of ֳ's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information ֳ relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to ֳ and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, ֳ must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. ֳ makes routine, commonly-accepted adjustments to reported financial data in accordance with the relevant criteria and/or industry standards to provide financial metric consistency for entities in the same sector or asset class.
The information in this report is provided 'as is' without any representation or warranty of any kind, and ֳ does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A ֳ rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by ֳ are based on established criteria and methodologies that ֳ is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of ֳ and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. ֳ is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All ֳ reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a ֳ report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a ֳ rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of ֳ. ֳ does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. ֳ receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, ֳ will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by ֳ shall not constitute a consent by ֳ to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, ֳ research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: ֳ Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by ֳ is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.
ֳ, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the 'NRSRO'). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see /site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the 'non-NRSROs') and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.
Copyright © 2024 by ֳ, Inc., ֳ Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved.