ֳ

ֳ Wire

Panama’s 2024 Fiscal Deficit Shows Deep Imbalance Even Net of One-Offs

Mon 03 Mar, 2025 - 12:47 PM ET

ֳ-New York/London-03 March 2025: Panama’s large 2024 fiscal deficit was partly due to transitory factors, but mainly highlights a deep underlying imbalance, ֳ says. The deficit will narrow this year but likely overshoot the target of President Jose Raul Mulino’s government without structural consolidation measures, prospects for which are unclear.

The 7.4%-of-GDP (USD6.4 billion) non-financial public-sector (NFPS) deficit reported for 2024 was far above the 4.7% we projected when we downgraded Panama to ‘BB+’ in March 2024. It would have been even larger without the reversion of some accounting decisions that flattered the 2023 deficit, resulting in its upward revision by 1pp to 4.0%.

One-off contributory factors included settlement of USD650 million of prior-year arrears (0.8% of GDP) in April and lower Panama Canal contributions due to a drought (0.3% of GDP). The Mulino government registered another USD730 million (0.8% of GDP) of arrears after it took office in July, but put much of this into the 2023 deficit without specifying how much went into the 2024 deficit. A tax amnesty yielded 0.1% of GDP.

However, the underlying deficit net of these one-offs was high at more than 6% of GDP. A significant consolidation effort would therefore be required to achieve the 4% revised target for 2025.

The government plans to achieve this via efforts to reduce tax evasion, and says it expects to increase collections by 42%, or 2.3% of GDP. We believe such a jump is unrealistic without broader tax reform, and that deficit reduction therefore hinges on spending cuts. These are not envisioned in the 2025 budget, which was increased substantially in the legislative process, and would thus require executive action.

The scope for such cuts is unclear, in our view. The education sector is likely to significantly under-execute its legally mandated 7%-of-GDP budget, but this already happened in 2024, and thus would not drive consolidation. Mulino plans to maintain a robust public works pipeline to lift employment. And the budget could be increased further, for example, to cover a shortfall of funds for scheduled “turnkey” project payments by the Panama City Metro.

Given these uncertainties, we expect NFPS deficits to narrow to 4.5% in 2025 and 4.0% in 2026, above their targets. This would lift gross debt/GDP to 66.0% in 2025 and 67.3% in 2026, from 62.8% in 2024. This contrasts with the authorities’ projection that debt/GDP will stabilize this year and decline thereafter.



ֳ’s higher debt/GDP projections reflect wider expected deficits, settlement of arrears recognized but unpaid as of end-2024, and borrowing to support the pension system. Government transfers to the pension system are neutral for the targeted NFPS deficit but add to the central government (CG) deficit that determines sovereign borrowing. The authorities project lower CG deficits relative to NFPS deficits, and thus lower borrowing. But ֳ projects CG deficits will be higher, as observed historically.

A pending pension reform could widen this differential. The authorities’ proposal calls for higher retirement ages and employer contributions and increases the government contribution to USD960 million. The legislature has diluted the parametric adjustments and increased the government contribution to USD1.5 billion.

The executive has threatened to veto the bill in response. Regardless of the outcome, we believe significant government support of the pension system is likely, keeping borrowing needs high and debt/GDP rising. And the outcome could be important for market sentiment and financing conditions.

We affirmed Panama’s rating with a Stable Outlook in December 2024 despite the greater-than-expected fiscal deterioration, indicating some headroom at ‘BB+’. Further fiscal slippage that steepens the projected rise in debt, or weakening in financing conditions, could put downward pressure on the rating.

Contacts:

Christopher Dychala
Associate Director, Sovereigns
+1 646 582 3558


ֳ, Inc.
Hearst Tower
300 W. 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

Todd Martinez
Senior Director, Sovereigns
+1 212 908 0897


Mark Brown
Senior Director, Credit Commentary & Research
+44 20 3530 1588




Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@thefitchgroup.com
Maggie Guimaraes, São Paulo, Tel: +55 11 4504 2207, Email: maggie.guimaraes@thefitchgroup.com

The above article originally appeared as a post on the ֳ Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at . All opinions expressed are those of ֳ.


All ֳ (ֳ) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: /understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following /rating-definitions-document details ֳ's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. ֳ's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders’ relevant interests are available at /site/regulatory. ֳ may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA- or FCA-registered ֳ company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the ֳ website.

In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), ֳ relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources ֳ believes to be credible. ֳ conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of ֳ's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of ֳ's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information ֳ relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to ֳ and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, ֳ must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. ֳ makes routine, commonly-accepted adjustments to reported financial data in accordance with the relevant criteria and/or industry standards to provide financial metric consistency for entities in the same sector or asset class.
The information in this report is provided 'as is' without any representation or warranty of any kind, and ֳ does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A ֳ rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by ֳ are based on established criteria and methodologies that ֳ is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of ֳ and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. ֳ is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All ֳ reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a ֳ report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a ֳ rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of ֳ. ֳ does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. ֳ receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, ֳ will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by ֳ shall not constitute a consent by ֳ to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, ֳ research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: ֳ Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by ֳ is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.
ֳ, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the 'NRSRO'). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see /site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the 'non-NRSROs') and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.
Copyright © 2025 by ֳ, Inc., ֳ Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved.